Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 162 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 25% better in Starfield than Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €56.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 302 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
54.71698113207547%
Multi-Core
1975
21.554076175924916%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |