Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €280.21 vs €507.89
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i9-10900F - 265 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €280.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Buy for €507.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
54.04708158658498%
Multi-Core
8426
40.12380952380952%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |