Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 33% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-7400T - 129 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
129
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€280.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €280.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
60.68019093078759%
Multi-Core
2806
33.3016852599098%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |