Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-4440 - 257 vs 238 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €59.04 vs €247.91
- Up to 74% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-10900F - €0.25 vs €0.96 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
257
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
26%
Price, €
€247.91
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €247.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
238
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |