Buy on Amazon
€247.91
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1399
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 157 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 240 vs 239 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - €247.91 vs €1506.42
- Up to 84% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - €1.03 vs €6.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 48 vs 20 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€247.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F
Buy for €247.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
239
99%
Value, €/FPS
€6.3/FPS
16%
Price, €
€1506.42
16%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960x (24 Kerne, Turbo Boost mit bis zu 4.5GHz, 280W), Medium
Buy for €1,506.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 24 |
| 20 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
