Buy on Amazon
€157.65
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $556
Availability
MSRP in USD: $556
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $312
Availability
MSRP in USD: $312
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10885H outperforms Core i7-4790 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10885H is 2163 days newer than Core i7-4790.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10885H
- Performs up to 3% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-4790 - 210 vs 204 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-4790 - 45 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790 - 16 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel i7-4790 Core Prozessor (3.6 GHz, Sockel 1150, 8M Cache, 84Watt)
Buy for €157.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65460 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10885H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Core i7-4790
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4790
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1221
79.6477495107632%
Multi-Core
3852
59.288902570417115%
Intel Core i9-10885H | vs | Intel Core i7-4790 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i9-10885H or Core i7-4790
Escape From Tarkov, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
100 FPS
€15.18/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Core i9-10885H
64 GB, 4 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€1,518
In Stock
100 FPS
€10.28/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Core i9-10885H
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€1,027.59
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.