Buy on Amazon
€110
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $556
Availability
MSRP in USD: $556
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10885H outperforms Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10885H is 348 days older than Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10885H
- Performs up to 0% better in Minecraft than Core i3-10105 - 720 vs 717 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 16 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
717
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105 10. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.7GHz Tuboboost: 4.4GHz, 4 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2380 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-10885H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10885H | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i9-10885H or Core i3-10105
Minecraft, 1920 x 1080, High
385 FPS
€3.94/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Core i9-10885H
64 GB, 4 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€1,518
In Stock
385 FPS
€2.67/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Core i9-10885H
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€1,027.59
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
