Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-965 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 4270 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-965 - 247 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €66.63 vs €299.95
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-10850K - €0.29 vs €1.21 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
247
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
23%
Price, €
€299.95
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
230
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 357 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Comet Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |