Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1203 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 194 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €191.69 vs €332.73
- Up to 38% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10850K - €1.06 vs €1.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.72/FPS
61%
Price, €
€332.73
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €332.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
180
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€191.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €191.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |