Buy on Amazon
€383.39
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $374
Availability
MSRP in USD: $374
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $174
Availability
MSRP in USD: $174
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 2445 days newer than Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Core i5-3450 - 89 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-9700KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
89
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€383.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-9700KF Prozessor (12M Cache, bis zu 4,90 GHz)
Buy for €383.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-9700KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i7-9700KF or Core i5-3450
Hogwarts Legacy, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
14 FPS
€66.36/FPS
GeForce GTX 1630
Core i7-9700KF
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€929
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
