Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 316 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 32% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Athlon 3000G - 400 vs 303 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - €65.0 vs €383.39
- Up to 78% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-9700KF - €0.21 vs €0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
400
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
21%
Price, €
€383.39
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €383.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Buy for €65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |