Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1144 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-6700T - 112 vs 103 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - €134.93 vs €353.68
- Up to 59% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-9700K - €1.31 vs €3.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.16/FPS
41%
Price, €
€353.68
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12178 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
103
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€134.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €134.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |