Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 414 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Halo Infinite than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 163 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - €180.0 vs €353.68
- Up to 47% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i7-9700K - €1.14 vs €2.17 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.17/FPS
52%
Price, €
€353.68
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13585 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
158
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13585 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |