Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 2700X - 178 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €290.43 vs €566.5
- Up to 46% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-9700F - €1.71 vs €3.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €566.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18039 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
170
95%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€290.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |