Buy on Amazon
€350.82
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $55
Availability
MSRP in USD: $55
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 229 days newer than Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Athlon 200GE - 131 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
INTEL Core i7-9700 3.0GHz LGA1151 12M Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €350.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
57.13367609254498%
Multi-Core
1857
29.869712079781248%
Intel Core i7-9700 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i7-9700 or Athlon 200GE
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor, 1920 x 1080, Epic
19 FPS
€40.47/FPS
GeForce GTX 1630
Core i7-9700
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€769
In Stock
19 FPS
€38.89/FPS
GeForce GTX 1630
Core i7-9700
8 GB, 256 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€739
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
