Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-965 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 5169 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €66.63 vs €690.13
- Up to 89% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-13900KS - €0.31 vs €2.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 130 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-965 - 253 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
214
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4354 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
253
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.73/FPS
11%
Price, €
€690.13
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €690.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4354 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 150 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |