Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-965 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 4502 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - €66.63 vs €113.77
- Up to 37% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-11400 - €0.46 vs €0.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than Core i7-965 - 156 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
145
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16003 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
63%
Price, €
€113.77
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16004 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |