Buy on Amazon
€66.63
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-965 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-965 is 1436 days older than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Performs up to 0% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-4300 - 451 vs 450 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-965 - €29.22 vs €66.63
- Up to 60% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i7-965 - €0.06 vs €0.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 95 vs 130 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Intel Core I7-965 I7 965 3,2 GHz Gebrauchter Quad-Core-CPU-Prozessor 130W 8M LGA 1366
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 334 minutes ago
AMD FX-Serie FX-4300 CPU verwendet 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 4M 95W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €29.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | FX |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
