Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 3043 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-940XM - 217 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 24 vs 8 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 165 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |