Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4507 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 55 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 13% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-920XM - 143 vs 127 FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-920XM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i3 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
