Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900 is 4129 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900
- Performs up to 84% better in F1 23 than Core i7-920XM - 267 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 24 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65708 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Single-Core
422
20.56530214424951%
Multi-Core
1128
11.434363912823112%
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |