Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 3574 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-920XM - 102 vs 90 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
102
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €88.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |