Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 2121 days newer than Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-920 - 98 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 20 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |