Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2629 days newer than Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-880 - 119 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 32 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
