Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-8700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 759 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-8700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i7-8700T - 185 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - €216.77 vs €235.49
- Up to 9% better value when playing Stray than Core i7-8700T - €1.17 vs €1.29 per FPS
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
183
98.91891891891892%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
90.69767441860465%
Price, €
€235.49
92%
Buy for €235.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |