Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 56 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 134 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - €102.0 vs €321.4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700K - 24 vs 12 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €321.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73996 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
128
95.52238805970148%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€102
100%
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73996 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
74.20986093552465%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |