Buy on Amazon
€221.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 2549 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 26% better in Rust than Core i7-2600S - 200 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - €75.84 vs €221.9
- Up to 57% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-8700 - €0.48 vs €1.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i7-8700 Prozessor (12 MB Cache, bis zu 3.2 GHz)
Buy for €221.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
159
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.84
100%
Value Winner
CHYYAC Intel Core I7-2600S I7 2600S I7 2600 S 2,8 GHz Quad-Core Achtkern 65 W CPU Prozessor LGA 1155
Buy for €75.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
