Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2893 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €45.78 vs €379.64
- Up to 88% better value when playing Control than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €0.23 vs €1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i7-860 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 24 vs 8 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €45.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.89/FPS
12%
Price, €
€379.64
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Lynnfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |