Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105 is 1750 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6950X - 159 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - €93.66 vs €329.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6950X - €0.59 vs €2.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €93.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |