Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 2577 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 15% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Phenom II X4 925 - 170 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Core i7-6800K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
26.143790849673206%
Multi-Core
930
16.428192898781134%
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
|---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | May 11th, 2009 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
| Broadwell-E | Codename | Deneb |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
