Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 2713 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €237.87 vs €344.13
- Up to 17% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-13700F - €2.2 vs €2.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-6700K - 130 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 24 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
108
83%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€237.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €237.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17157 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.65/FPS
83%
Price, €
€344.13
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for €344.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |