Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1734 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10400F - 568 vs 562 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - €99.61 vs €237.87
- Up to 57% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-6700K - €0.18 vs €0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €237.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
562
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |