Buy on Amazon
€237.87
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1734 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 0% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i5-10400 - 491 vs 489 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - €156.87 vs €237.87
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 12 vs 8 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Intel Core i7-6700K Prozessor der 6. Generation (bis zu 4 GHz mit Intel Turbo-Boost-Technik 2.0, 8 MB Intel Smart-Cache)
Buy for €237.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75076 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-10400 (Basistakt: 2,90GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box
Buy for €156.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75076 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i7-6700K
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 91 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i7-6700K or Core i5-10400
DOOM Eternal, 1920 x 1080, Nightmare
100 FPS
€9.99/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-10400
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€999
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
