Buy on Amazon
€999.9
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $346
Availability
MSRP in USD: $346
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1149
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 3579 days newer than Core i7-640M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 150% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-640M - 115 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 32 vs 4 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
115
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€999.9
100%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (16C/32T, 72 MB Cache, bis zu 4,3 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for €999.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66315 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-640M
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Arrandale | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.