Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 2727 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 25 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 13% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-640LM - 132 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 20 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i9-7900X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
