Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 3393 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-620M - 540 vs 504 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-620M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
