Buy on Amazon
€51.08
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 365 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 17% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3900 - 170 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €51.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75504 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
50.08620689655172%
Multi-Core
992
18.22524343193092%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell E | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
