Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5700HQ outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5700HQ is 758 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5700HQ
- Performs up to 10% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EPYC 7551P - 322 vs 294 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5700HQ - 64 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2015
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5700HQ | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | EPYC |
Broadwell | Codename | Naples |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 5600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |