Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i7-4940MX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2612 days newer than Core i7-4940MX.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4940MX
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 57 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4940MX - 132 vs 128 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4940MX | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
57 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |