Buy on Amazon
Out of Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $570
Availability
MSRP in USD: $570
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4900MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1782 days newer than Core i7-4900MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4900MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-4900MQ - 222 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4900MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 R5 2600 3,4 GHz Sechskern-Zwölf-Thread-65-W-CPU-Prozessor YD2600BBM6IAF Sockel AM4
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 17427 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-4900MQ
Mobile • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4900MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
