Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4820K outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4820K is 1220 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 23 than Celeron G3930T - 163 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-4820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
83.28267477203647%
Multi-Core
948
38.85245901639344%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
