Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4820K outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4820K is 313 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8320 - 171 vs 168 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 125 vs 130 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-4820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
