Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4810MQ outperforms Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4810MQ is 707 days newer than Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Core i7-3820 - 149 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 47 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |