Key Differences
In short — Xeon w7-2495X outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w7-2495X is 3579 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w7-2495X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon w7-2495X
- Performs up to 25% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-4800MQ - 125 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 48 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Xeon w7-2495X
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | Intel Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 15th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Haswell | Codename | Sapphire Rapids |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 4677 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 48 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 47 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
