Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1982 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 47 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4800MQ - 170 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 48 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 250 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |