Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1551 days newer than Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i7-4765T - 182 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 16 vs 8 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
912
78.08219178082192%
Multi-Core
2911
50.24162927166034%
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
