Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1782 days newer than Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-4765T - 200 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
912
81.86714542190305%
Multi-Core
2911
53.0333394060849%
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
