Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 599 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8120 - 122 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
