Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4712MQ outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4712MQ is 132 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4712MQ
- Performs up to 8% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1620 - 106 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 37 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-4712MQ
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2013
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4712MQ | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 14th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
37 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
