Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Core i7-4700MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1415 days newer than Core i7-4700MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700MQ
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 47 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-4700MQ - 127 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4700MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Single-Core
996
88.69100623330365%
Multi-Core
3040
63.78514477549307%
Intel Core i7-4700MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |